- Clayton Ballentine
- Sep 12
- 1 min read
In recent days, I’ve seen some Republican activists calling the employers of people who’ve made vile comments about Charlie Kirk’s death. That approach should be rejected by anyone who values free speech.
This is cancel culture 2.0, except this time it is coming from the Right. As principled defenders of free speech, we should reject that approach and stand firm in our commitment to free expression. Free speech means protecting even speech we find offensive, because the alternative is a culture where every side takes turns trying to destroy one another’s livelihoods. That only deepens division and silences open debate.
My heart and prayers remain with Charlie’s family, friends, and the countless people whose lives he impacted through his work. I deeply respected his courage, his commitment to conservative principles, and his belief in open dialogue. If we truly want to honor his life and legacy, we should continue to foster open dialogue rather than silence, persuasion rather than punishment.
I am committed to not engaging in cancel culture. Instead, I will continue to stand for open dialogue and free speech principles, while focusing accountability where it belongs: on elected officials and those seeking public office. Private citizens should not be targeted, even when we strongly disagree with them.
The way forward is not in silencing, but in persuasion. That is how we build a stronger, freer, and more united America.